Whose Story Is It, Anyway?
Hello friends,

It’s funny how certain ideas bubble around for a while until they hit an inflection point. And then, all of the sudden, they are everywhere.

That’s what’s happening to me right now. All of the sudden, it feels like everyone is asking me about the power dynamics in storytelling.

And I am HERE. FOR. IT.

Let me explain what I mean. And like many good storytellers, I’m gonna go back to the beginning.

Way back in journalism school, I was taught to require all sorts of things from the people I was interviewing.
Rule 1: They have to agree to talk, with no questions off limits.

Rule 2: They will have no prior knowledge of what questions I will ask.

Rule 3: Once the recording begins, everything is on the record, unless they specifically ask me to turn off the recording.

Rule 4: They will have no say in what I do with any of the information or quotes they share with me.

Rule 5: They will not receive any sort of compensation for their participation.

Rule 6: They will not stand to benefit in any way if I later sell their story to the highest bidder.
This is how it was done. This is how it has ALWAYS been done.

And look, a lot of these rules exist for a good reason.

When a politician agrees to an interview, everything they say should be on the record. And when a multi-millionaire wants to use your outlet to promote their business, you absolutely must be allowed to ask them about their company’s poor record when it comes to worker’s rights.

The rules exist to protect journalism from undue outside influence. And they assume that the journalist is talking to someone in a higher position of power. A politician. A powerful business person. Even a celebrity.

But for quite a while now, many journalists have been starting to question these rules. And for good reason.
Microphone photo by wuz on Unsplash.
Are you subscribed to Narrative Beat yet?
Subscribe now!
As my work has changed from “journalism” to “storytelling,” I am interviewing fewer politicians, business people and celebrities. And I am seeking out more of what I would call “stakeholders.”

These are people who are directly impacted by the issues I am covering. They’re the Black woman who was harassed by a white woman at a pool. They’re the survivor of a brutal sexual assault. Or the parent of a child who died by suicide.

These people are not in a position of power over me. In fact, in many of these circumstances, I’m the one holding all the power.

But should I be?

Is it right for me to strictly uphold the “rules” when I’m interviewing someone from a marginalized community who has little to no experience with being interviewed?

Is it ethical for me to tell a grieving parent or a sexual assault survivor or a whistleblower that I hold all the control over how their story is told?

Is it fair that I stand to benefit financially, when my stakeholders – who have sometimes been through something very traumatic – do not?

And most importantly…where is the list of rules that describe what I owe to the people who share their story with me?

So..I had a thought. Let’s make a list. I’m gonna get us started. But I’m hoping you will share your ideas with me, and together we will come up with something even better.

Rule 1: I will listen to your concerns and give you the time you need to feel comfortable.

Look. We’re all busy. I have deadlines. You have deadlines.

But part of the problem here is that we helicopter into these stories, and immediately start barreling towards the juicy center.

We don’t take the time to get to know our interview subjects as people first. We don’t take the time to answer all of their questions and make them feel comfortable.

(And, yes, I’m being very general here. Because I know that plenty of us DO take the time to do these things. But not everyone. And that’s a problem.)

I’m one of those people who wants to get the tape rolling ASAP, so that I don’t miss anything good.

But I force myself to slow down – either at the beginning of an interview or during the scheduling phase – to answer questions about the interview process itself.

How long will it take? What’s my goal? What type of questions might I ask? What should the person do if they’re overwhelmed? Or if I ask a question they don’t want to answer? Or if they want to tell me something, but they’re not sure they want it to be “on the record?”

Once the tape is rolling, I’ll often give people some leeway to say the things they want to say – even if those things don’t directly relate to the story I’m working on.

I’ll listen. I’ll engage. I’ll learn new things that might actually be reflected in my reporting!

And then I’ll gently redirect the interview back to the issue at hand.

That said – and this is a VERY big caveat – boundaries are healthy for everyone.

Let’s say that again…

Boundaries are healthy for EVERYONE.

No, I will not answer the phone when you call outside of my work hours.

No, I will not let you endlessly trauma dump on me when the tape is not rolling.

No, I will not serve as your therapist, or your legal advisor, or your doctor, or your accountant.

Crossing those lines are not just bad for me, they’re also bad for the person I am interviewing. So I will hold those boundaries.

Rule 2: I will be fair, which means you might not always like what I have to say.

Someone recently asked me how I make sure that I’m describing people the way they’d describe themselves.

And the answer is, I don’t.

I describe people the way I see them. And then I make clear that this is my perspective. Someone else might have a different one.

It gets even trickier when trying to decide what tape to use and what tape to leave behind.

We always have a choice. We can use someone’s strongest tape. Or we can use the tape that makes them sound like a fool.

It’s a lot of power. And, if you’re a fan of Spider-Man, you know…with great power comes great responsibility.

I’m reminded of a story I did, where one side was convinced that the thing the other side was doing was illegal.

That was really important to them. They told me again and again, “This is illegal. It should not be allowed to happen.”

I looked into it. I did my research. Talked to some experts. And in fact, the thing in question was not illegal.

Despicable? Yes. Immoral? Maybe. Illegal? No.

So, I had a choice. I could either let them go on and on about how this thing is illegal – only to debunk that notion later.

Or I could write narration that said something like, “Now you might think this is illegal, but I checked – and it’s not.” And then move on to more compelling arguments.

I bet you already know which one I chose.

Rule 3: I will not ask you for an exclusive, unless I’m offering you something in return.

Oh, this is going to be a controversial one, but I’m gonna do it anyway!

There is a thing that’s happening in storytelling right now, especially in the true crime and true crime adjacent sphere. Podcast producers and documentary filmmakers are approaching people and saying things like, “I want to put you in my podcast and/or documentary film, but you can only participate if you sign this exclusive agreement.”

Generally, those agreements prohibit that person from talking publicly about their story to anyone else. And the terms can last anywhere from a year to … life.

(Yes, I’ve seen one that actually never expires.)

The people who sign these agreements often don’t really understand what they’re signing. And they certainly don’t understand that they’re giving away something of value in exchange for absolutely nothing.

I get it. Exclusive agreements are sometimes necessary. I can’t ask a funder to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on a project that’s built around an “exclusive” interview, if the interview is not actually exclusive.

But if someone is central enough to the story to require that their interview be exclusive, they’re also central enough to the story to receive a piece of the proceeds – should that story turn into a book, a TV show, or a movie.

So, yeah. They’re important enough to get PAID.

There...I said it!

And I gotta say, I feel okay about it.
There's room for a lot more rules on this list! I have a few in mind. But…I’m curious. What would you add?

Send me a message and let me know!

And don't forget to show your support of the Narrative Beat community.

1. Share this newsletter with a friend. You can simply forward this email, or send them to my full archive and subscribe link!

2. Join our Patreon! Yep...Narrative Beat now has a Patreon. You can join for free, but you'll get extra benefits for being a paid member.

3. Drop a few bucks in the Narrative Beat tip jar. I set this up for folks who aren't interested in committing to a monthly membership, but they still want to help me cover my email fees and help sponsor even more scholarships to my Narrative Beat workshops.

Karen